[ Up | Interfaces | Sitemap | CLiki ]
All reasonable, modern OSs support games, and Tunes should not be an exception. The trick with games is how to provide an API that is quick and portable enough to be used reasonably, while being reasonably consistant and friendly with the rest of the OS.
One of the interface project's goals is to automate, to some reasonable extent, the creation of the UI, so the programmer is freed from much of the burden. However, taking away this "burden" from a game programmer is, in essence, taking away the ability to write a game. Therefore, in addition to the higher-level, more automatic libraries, we must allow reasonably direct access to the screen, and other hardware.Matthew Gruenke suggested:
It is my hope that Tunes will be able to provide low-level libraries, with sufficiently speedy (yet portable) line/arc/polygon drawing, bit transfer, and maybe some 3D things, that a game written for Tunes will be able to function, with decent speed, on any Tunes platform with pixel-based video hardware, be this hardware a 386 VGA Screen, whatever they have on Indys (evil grin), or an X Window.
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 15:45:35 -0600 (CST)
From: Matthew Gruenke
Subject: Re: INT: Project Alive!
I like games. I'll port all of my games (numbering 0, right now) to this OS, if I possibly can!! It is my belief that what would be most optimal would be something similar to what Windows 3.x does with WinG. WinG, if you don't happen to know, allows for direct bit-plane access (as a 2D array in memory). A simple call can be used to x-fer this bit-plane to the gfx hardware for displaying. Graphics should be able to be directed straight to the screen, or to such a frame-buffer in main-mem. The graphics-drawing functions (i.e. DrawLine, DrawPoly, etc. should be able to function in EITHER case, and should be fast enough for some reasonable 3D gaming!! As a matter of fact, I think it would be nice to include a 3D gfx lib (which could either utilize the 2D functions, to a degree, or if they're not high-performance enough, could cut them outta the chain)!) I think it's important to allow for at least this amount of flexibility, if not more, in order to make the platform graphics- friendly! I also think it's important to allow parts of the GUI to be easily re-written or replaced (possible to allow for some expirementation with 3D GUI's, or atleast a good deal of customization). Normal applications should NOT ever be able to take complete control of the system. The OS MUST remain capable of doing comm-access, ftp x-fers, etc. in the background w/o causing errors, due to some poorly written (but possibly fun) game!! EVERYTHING should be able to multi-task!!
Fare concludes: a Good Thing (TM) would be to port GGI to Tunes.
This document last modified on Sunday, 29-Oct-2006 13:02:08 PST. See the ChangelogWebmaster